One of the most prominent differences in the connection profiles of prefrontal area 46 and the FEF is that the latter sends efferents to areas V2, V3, V3A and V4t while the former communicates only with area V4.
To determine whether differences in the connection probabilities for FSIs (p = 0.43) and NFSIs (p = 0.21) did not arise by chance, we modeled each of the two data sets as observations from two binomial distributions.
Regardless of their diagnosis, those carrying the CNTNAP2 variant had differences in the connections within the frontal lobe of the brain itself and between the frontal lobe and the rest of the brain.
To estimate the p-value of the initially observed discerns between the two irrigation treatments, the following equation was used: p = c + 1 1000 + 1 To demonstrate the differences in the connections between metabolites of similar biochemical backgrounds, we ordered them into communities of compound classes.
The difference in the hydrologic connection (channel width and height) between the two stations is important because there is no ridge between the irrigation pond and paddy field at station 6, allowing fish to move between habitats.
There was no such difference in the corresponding connection of the mesial loop, i.e. PFC-SMA, either between patients and controls, or in the patients group between Extern and the two voluntary conditions (P > 0.1).
Because all maps are composed of the same nodes and links, there are differences only in the connection of links in the comparison between maps.
Comparing different scenarios, the average difference between ED and MHED routes is greater in Scenario 1 than in Scenario 2. As every other parameter is the same for the two scenarios in this experiment, the explanation of the difference is found in the connection profiles.
We hypothesize that the differences in the mean connection probabilities are explained by differences in the methodology applied to obtain the connectivity maps: Physiological recordings in slices are usually restricted to a maximal lateral distance of the somata of around 100 μm (as reported in Thomson and Morris (2002) for the raw physiological map).
The occurrence of split sister centromere signals at metaphase I in a significant proportion of pans1 meiocytes is indicative of a difference in the closeness of connection between sister centromeres relative to wild type.
