Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
The underlying reason is that the line predicting true endpoint from potential surrogate endpoint has a sufficiently different slope for each randomization group to make a substantial difference in the conclusion.
Similar(59)
The way the data from various studies is divvied up or combined in a meta-analysis can make a big difference in the conclusions.
We tested that there was no difference in the conclusions by either taking the threshold at 5% or 20%, thus indicating that results are robust.
We carried out pooled analyses including either the case/control comparison or the TDT subgroup from that study; there was no material difference in the conclusions whichever population was included (data available on request).
There was no difference in the conclusions we reached by either method.
Importantly, there was no difference in the conclusions from the two types of measurements, as both PCNA staining and EdU pulsing indicated a 1.8 increase in ependymoglia proliferation upon re-oxygenation compared to control animals.
As long as the sample size is even moderate (>20) for each group, quite severe departures from normality make little practical difference in the conclusions reached from these analyses [ 32].
So long as the sample size is even moderate (>20) for each group, quite severe departures from normality make little practical difference in the conclusions reached from these analyses [ 34].
Again, we find no significant difference in the conclusions to be drawn from the data when quantification of phosphorylated proteins is compared to their respective total proteins or β-Actin.
Maybe the use of so many microorganisms growing under such different growth conditions could explain, at least in part, the differences in the conclusions reached by authors regarding the best-fitting model.
The differences in experimental setup and timescale of observations likely contributed to the differences in the conclusions between our and their studies.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com