Sentence examples for difference in sum from inspiring English sources

However, he found no regional difference; "In sum, there is no evidence that hailing from the South is correlated with a greater concern for the impressions one gives to others, and only the faintest evidence that southernness may be correlated with lesser concern".

Let us consider the case of having a larger difference in sum of utilities for initial goods.

It is assumed that Villages 1 and 2 have goods in their initial possession list with a difference in sum of utilities for initial goods of possession.

* Difference in Sum due to Rounding.

6 7 The investigations that examined the difference in SUM prevalence between adolescents living in urban and rural areas mostly found differences between individual communities.

This is found by taking column C *1.07 * a variable called Rate, and summing the results, then Goal Seeking versus either C52 or E52 and changing the Rate cell until the difference in Sum to UNIT FINDS or Sum of: is zero.

The NEA's budget of some $160 million/year is, given all our other governmental priorities and disbursements, pitiful (my comment -- France's Ministry of Culture's budget would be more that $9 billion on a pro rata basis, if you compared the two organizations. Though they have somewhat different mandates, the difference in sums speaks volumes).

This proportion decreases to 13.3 % for primary and secondary referral hospitals, and to 10%% for third-tier referral hospitals (Table  3).> -wrap-foot> Dinference in total sums are due to rounding We then used the distribution factors obtained through this calculation to parcel out non-targeted public expenditures to different providers for different services.

One further study of 176 women found higher estimation by self-report (27.9%) than by objective criteria, which varied between 0.6% (10% or greater difference in summed arm circumference), 11.4% (multifrequency bioimpedance: 3 or more SD above the reference score), and 11.9% (5 cm or greater difference in summed arm circumference) [ 10].

To compare firing rates of configurations in Figure 5A and Table 1, the change in firing rate was defined as the difference in summed firing rates across all stimulations divided by the lowest summed firing rate of the two configurations.

However, further evidence of greater prevalence estimation by self-report (27.9%) was also found when compared with 11.9% for 5 cm or greater difference in summed arm circumference, 0.6% for 10% or greater summed arm circumference, and 11.4% according to multifrequency bioimpedance, using a difference of 3 or more standard deviations above the reference score [ 10].