Sentence examples for difference in sign from inspiring English sources

The standard errors of the repeated measures animal model were very similar to the standard errors estimated according to Lessells and Boag's method [31], as indicated by the high correlation (r = 0.994, N = 8, P<0.001) and non-significant difference in sign and magnitude (ZW = 0.84, N = 8, P = 0.4) [20.4

We conjecture that this difference in sign may suggest less voluntary control in MCI 2 as does the lack of specific involvement of the paralimbic ACC.

The opposite relationship between the two major trends is clearly identified by the difference in sign of the coefficients corresponding to the linear, quadratic and cubic terms between the trends.

In the case of neutrons, the difference in sign of the scattering lengths of H and D means that the use of different deuteration schemes can dramatically change the scattering length of different isotopologues.

It looks like one has a very small negative effect and the other a very small positive effect, and it is not obvious whether we can rule out zero (and therefore no difference in sign) for either one, based on the error bars.

Dodger shortstop Cesar Izturis is considered among the best fielders at his position in the National League, but the club would consider moving Izturis to second base, where he played with Toronto, if it made a difference in signing Matsui.

The difference in sign-up rate to the Sentinel Data Capture over time was visualised in a Kaplan-Meier plot and analysed with a log-rank test.

The difference in signs of the two terms indicates that A is a repulsive system since the potential increases with increased concentrations, whereas B is an attractive system where the potential instead decreases with increased concentrations.

They compared the results with a matched sample of patients who had not undergone orthodontic treatment and found no difference in signs or symptoms of TMJ dysfunction syndrome between the two groups.

Differences in sign and magnitude between estimates were a consequence of the different assumptions regarding the covariances between herd-year effects in SMM and RMM1 versus those in RMM2 and RMM3.

Differences in sign density between bear species within each habitat were tested with Mann-Whitney U-tests.