Sentence examples for difference in procedural from inspiring English sources

Study 1 found that problem-posing prior to instruction resulted in significantly better transfer to novel problems than problem-solving, without any significant difference in procedural knowledge and conceptual understanding.

Stasko et al. (1993) did not get any significant difference in procedural understanding between the "No viewing" group and group that could run the visualization on their input data sets (Changing level) on the topic of Pairing heap.

A previously unappreciated finding was the marked difference in procedural pain favoring ultrasound guidance.

1 4 This difference in procedural stroke is mostly attributed to an excess of minor non-disabling strokes.

In contrast to Cardiovascular Patient Outcomes Research Team-E trial (CPORT-E) there was also no difference in procedural success or in 12-month outcomes including target vessel revascularisation (TVR).

14 With improvements in PCI technology and procedures, this study found no differences in procedural success rate, mortality, or complications, including vascular complications and major bleeding (see Table 3).

Some of the discrepancies in terms of methodological requirements between the two HTA systems may, at least in part, be explained by differences in procedural aspects and differences in the robustness of the data assessed at distinct stages of the technology's life cycle.

Fifth, as with any observational study, the association between RSI method and a higher chance of intubation success does not necessarily prove causality and may be confounded by unmeasured factors, such as patient's underlying comorbidity, airway difficulty, and differences in procedural skill.

A more detailed comparison of rmodel and PLATA (Supplemental Text S1) revealed that despite the differences in procedural details, their results are largely equivalent when tests are performed on the same putative segmentations on the same microarray data.

There were no major differences in procedural success among the groups.

However, there were several significant differences in procedural and angiographic data, and clinical outcomes (Table 2).