Sentence examples for difference in print from inspiring English sources

The difference in print morphology is related to a fundamental difference in body weight transfer between extended limb and BKBH gaits.

Interestingly, in the rats tested there was a significant difference in print area between front and hind paws, with front paws covering a larger area (149.30 ± 0.66 mm2 vs 96.67 ± 0.73 mm, P < 0.0001, Figure 1A, C).

Because of the difference in printing methods between real and fake bills, the border ink can sometimes bleed on a fake.

This supports the idea that the context process reflects differences in print exposure [19].

(This is consistent with Smith's report of 21% reduction in reading speed when case is alternated in this way [38].) The contextual sentence process, S, accounts for 22% of reading rate, on average, but is variable across readers (mean±SD = 87±30 word/min), which may reflect individual differences in print exposure (see ref. 19).

Additionally, differences in print quality, differences in ambient conditions when the plates were processed or changes in the scanner settings can cause scaling differences between microarrays.

It is unclear from the current results whether there is a genetic path linking early individual differences in reading with later individual differences in print exposure.

This finding is consistent with previous twin research showing genetic influences on individual differences in print exposure (e.g., Harlaar et al., 2011; Martin et al., 2009).

The relation between print exposure and reading skill is reciprocal: Individual differences in print exposure both predict and are predicted by individual differences in reading and reading-related skills (Mol & Bus, 2011).

All repeats clustered next to the first sample run irrespective of the differences in print batch (data not shown), hence replicate assays were merged in a weighted fashion, as previously described [ 58].

However, using the Twins Early Development Study TEDSS; Haworth, Davis, & Plomin, 2013), we have previously found that individual differences in print exposure at age 10 as assessed by the Author Recognition Test (ART) are predicted by word reading fluency at age 7, assessed by the Test of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE; Harlaar, Dale, & Plomin, 2007b).