difference in intelligibility

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "difference in intelligibility" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations in how understandable or clear something is, often in the context of communication or language. Example: "The study revealed a significant difference in intelligibility between the two dialects, affecting how well speakers could understand each other."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

For a given amount of absorption, in a regularly-shaped dining hall the difference in intelligibility between various absorber arrangements is generally negligible, whereas in a flat or long dining hall it is important to strategically arrange the absorbers.

Applied Acoustics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

However, there may be considerable differences in intelligibility between items in a corpus.

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics

There were no statistically significant differences in intelligibility, fluency, and voicing between the two patient groups, but the sound of the voice was significantly worse in patients older than 65 years of age (P = 0.01).

Clinical interventions in aging

Indeed, one might imagine that differences in intelligibility between the clear and noise-vocoded speech would have been further exacerbated by continuous data acquisition in which sounds were played over the competing noise of the scanner (in contrast to the sparse acquisition conducted in this study).

Cerebral Cortex

Although results indicated longer sentence durations for SC than SA, the data showed no difference in the intelligibility of speech produced during SC versus speech produced during SA under either the noise or filtered listening condition, nor any difference in pattern of phonetic contrast recognition errors between the SA and SC speech samples in either listening condition.

Journal of Communication Disorders

A paired t-test conducted on the post-scanning syllable identification scores after conversion to rationalized arcsine units (Studebaker 1985) showed there to be a small but significant difference in the intelligibility of the 2 degradation types (t16 = 3.635, P = 0.002), with NV (mean proportion correct = 0.95) shown to be more intelligible than SW speech (mean = 0.88) (Fig.  1 Bii).

Cerebral Cortex

However, this confound is not present in the 4 channel and 4 channel rotated conditions, which differ in intelligibility but are well matched for spectral complexity.

Cerebral Cortex

The spectrogram was used to visually demonstrate how noise and reverberation degrade the speech intelligibility and to compare the differences in speech intelligibility before and after using the method.

EURASIP Journal on Audio, Speech, and Music Processing

An experiment is presented which demonstrates the differences in speech intelligibility scores that occur when different speakers are employed.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Although results indicated longer sentence durations for SC than SA, results showed no difference in the overall intelligibility of speech produced during SC versus speech produced during SA, nor any difference in pattern of phonetic contrast recognition errors during SC.

Journal of Communication Disorders

The 3-way interaction was not significant, showing that there was no evidence of a difference in the interaction between intelligibility and spectral detail, as expressed across the regions (F2,22 = 2.284, P = 0.126).

Cerebral Cortex

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When comparing different versions of speech or text, explicitly state the factors you are controlling for. This ensures that the "difference in intelligibility" observed is directly attributable to the variable under investigation.

Common error

Avoid making broad claims about a "difference in intelligibility" without clearly specifying the conditions under which the difference occurs. Provide details such as background noise levels, speaker characteristics, or audience demographics to add context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "difference in intelligibility" functions as a noun phrase, often serving as the subject or object of a sentence. It describes a variation or distinction in how easily something is understood. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

20%

Wiki

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "difference in intelligibility" is used to describe variations in how easily something can be understood. According to Ludwig, this phrase is grammatically correct and most frequently found in scientific and technical contexts. While it is not exceedingly common, it is readily understood and can be a precise way to describe variations in clarity. Consider using alternatives such as "variation in clarity" or "disparity in understandability" to diversify your vocabulary. When using "difference in intelligibility", ensure you provide sufficient context to specify the factors contributing to the observed difference. This phrase often appears in academic and research papers, but can also be found in news media when reporting on related topics. Although examples may be limited, its meaning and usage are clear and consistent.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

variation in clarity

This alternative replaces "intelligibility" with "clarity", focusing on how clear something is.

disparity in understandability

This uses "understandability" instead of "intelligibility", highlighting the degree to which something can be understood.

contrast in comprehensibility

This uses "comprehensibility" to emphasize the ability to grasp the meaning.

divergence in explicitness

This focuses on how explicitly something is conveyed, affecting understanding.

distinction in lucidity

This uses "lucidity" to highlight the ease with which something is understood.

shift in coherence

This emphasizes how the level of coherence influences comprehension.

alteration in perceptibility

This shifts the focus to how easily something can be perceived or understood.

deviation in articulacy

This looks at how well something is articulated, impacting its intelligibility.

range of interpretability

This addresses the different ways something can be interpreted, reflecting variations in intelligibility.

degree of transparency

This uses "transparency" to highlight how easily the meaning can be seen.

FAQs

How can I use "difference in intelligibility" in a sentence?

You can use "difference in intelligibility" to describe variations in how easily something can be understood, for example: "The study revealed a significant difference in intelligibility between the two accents."

What are some alternatives to saying "difference in intelligibility"?

Alternatives include "variation in clarity", "disparity in understandability", or "contrast in comprehensibility", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

What factors contribute to a "difference in intelligibility"?

Factors can include accent, background noise, speech clarity, and the listener's familiarity with the subject matter.

In research, how is "difference in intelligibility" typically measured?

It is often measured using subjective tests where listeners transcribe or repeat what they hear, and the accuracy is scored. Objective measures, such as speech recognition software, can also be used.