The phrase "difference in focus" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It refers to the variation or distinction in the subject or main point of a sentence or statement. You can use it when describing the contrast between two or more ideas or perspectives within a sentence. For example: "There is a clear difference in focus between the two essays. While one emphasizes the importance of individualism, the other highlights the benefits of collectivism."
The conclusion of Smith Spangler, he says, was influenced by a difference in focus which lead them to look at individual antioxidants rather than pooling them as one.
But despite this difference in focus, both books go right to the main issues, practical and otherwise, that we all are facing or will face one day.
Despite this difference in focus, however, it is clear that Goodman and Schama, who both grew up Jewish in Britain after the Second World War, share some basic assumptions about what Jewish history teaches.
The reason for this difference in focus is most likely methodological.
One possible reason for this discrepancy is a difference in focus.
One CCM domain, 'community resources and policies' (4 items), was left out of the overall score due to difference in focus and lower correlation with other domains.
As well, there was no difference in foci numbers between RNAi treated and mock treated cells (Figure 6C).
Likewise, no difference in foci size was observed when parallel Huh7-1 monolayers were inoculated with virus derived from the different Huh7 cells (data not shown).
Despite the obvious difference in foci size, HCV RNA exponentially expanded with similar kinetics and eventually reached comparable plateau levels (∼2.3×107 HCV copies/µg RNA) in the different infected Huh7 cell cultures, with the exception of the Huh7-6 cells which consistently supported lower levels of HCV infection (Figure 5A and Table 1).
No difference in foci number per nucleus was found when comparing CAG200- and CUG200-expressing cells (Supplementary Material, Table S2).
The early time points, that is, 30 min and 2 h, indicated no significant difference in foci number of APPL1- or APPL2-depleted cells relative to controls.
