Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(60)
First, the difference in distribution may reflect different temporal responses to cellular hypoxia.
We could find no significant difference in distribution of MUC5AC in different polyps.
The difference in distribution could be due to different p19ARF expression levels within individual tumor cells.
However, this difference in distribution of ocular manifestation in different age groups was not statistically significant (p>0.05) (Table 1).
We found no difference in distribution of histological subtypes (p = 0.97) between different sex (Table 2).
The proposed method uses the Kullback-Leibler divergence (KLD) as the index of difference in distribution between two groups.
This difference in distribution suggests that observations were strongly affected by atmospheric conditions due to the weather.
The difference in distribution implies that simple expression of procoagulant lipid was not the only determinant of procoagulant activity.
Even, significant difference in distribution pattern was not recorded at exposure of 50 and 100 nm.
No difference in distribution was found between the two variants [χ 2(1) = .67, n.s.].
The Chi square test shows that the difference in distribution is significant (p < 0.01).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com