Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
If we assume that at least 5% of women in both arms of the study who did not complete the survey did complete diagnostic follow-up procedures, the difference in completion of follow-up procedures is statistically significant at p < 0.05 (Table 4).
There was no difference in completion of process measures.
Consequently, there was no difference in completion of immunization between most poor and the least poor.
The presence of television and radio in their home also showed difference in completion of child immunization in multiple logistic regression.
In patients with positive smear results, there was a non-significant difference in completion of treatment (31/40, 78% for the intervention group v 25/37, 68% for controls, 1.15, 0.87 to 1.52; see table 4).
Similar(55)
Non-inferiority of the SROM group could be stated if the lower limit of the CI, for a maximum acceptable difference in completion rates of −3%, did not exceed −15%, which was defined as a clinically acceptable non-inferiority limit [ 22].
There was no difference in completion rates of the four instruments.
However, the differences by sex in completion of the survey are observed exclusively in the health promoter category.
The most likely explanation for the difference in completion rates was location of where CMHWs provided therapy.
Secondary objectives of this trial were: to compare the difference in completion rates between two methods of delivery; to describe the process, and difficulties associated with either method of delivery; to compare the information about symptoms from the patient tool with that obtained from primary care records.
There was no significant difference between experimental groups in completion of baseline or follow-up measures (χ(1df) < 1.6, P > 0.21).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com