Sentence examples for difference in biodiversity from inspiring English sources

Two recent studies within the European Arctic have identified intriguing evidence of a difference in biodiversity between the eastern and western sides of the Greenland Sea.

But Philpott found no difference in biodiversity.

The overall difference in biodiversity measures among the eDNA methods can be explained in part by a simple consideration of the physical size and density of these very different organisms.

We find substantial differences in biodiversity conservation scores generated by simple voluntary incentive-based policies and efficient solutions.

The main causes for the differences in biodiversity, climate change and land use change are as a result of the differences in livestock management, feed, feed conversion and greenhouse gas production by ruminants.

In order to analyze the utility of the two methodological approaches for identifying differences in biodiversity patterns between primary and secondary forests, the following analyses were done separately for the molecular data and the morphological data: Welch-two-sample t-tests were used to compare mean richness and density of taxa between habitats.

Our results support an earlier conclusion stating that the homogenizing effects of migration and stochasticity are not able to eliminate the interslope intra- and interspecific differences in biodiversity despite an interslope distance of only 100 m at the "EC" valley bottom.

The salinity gradient further imposes functional differences in biodiversity and food webs, in particular a decline in number, but increase in biomass of mesograzers in the Baltic.

Multivariate analyses suggest that these biology-environment interactions are multidimensional: techniques integrating many physical and chemical measurements performed as well as or better than nearly all of the individual parameters at predicting differences in biodiversity.

Pseudomonas genus had significantly higher relative abundance in stable colonised patients (p = 0.019), but no significant differences in biodiversity parameters were found between the two groups (Shannon, 3 (2–4) vs 3 (2–3), p = 0.699; Chao1, 124 (77–159) vs 140 (115–163), p = 0.364).

The ANN detects small differences in biodiversity patterns due to the selection of single wavenumbers in contrast to whole spectral regions as chosen for the library, which explains its higher discriminatory power and robustness compared to the spectral library based identification system.