Exact(3)
We also found that adolescents who said that girls who smoke or chew tobacco are less attractive were 13% (OR = 0.87; 95%CI 0.86, 0.89) less likely to be smokers compared to those who said that there was no difference in attractiveness between smokers and non-smokers, or smokers were more attractive than non-smokers.
These results reflect the outcomes of analyses testing the difference in attractiveness between treatments for each time period.
30 32–34 The non-significant difference in attractiveness between Silk Cut EU TPD and Standardised packs among the full sample is more likely due to male participants reacting adversely to the 'feminine' characteristics of the branded packs and selecting the darker, 'more masculine' standardised pack instead.
Similar(57)
Tests conducted in 4-arm olfactometers with vegetative plants and flowering plants separately showed significant differences in attractiveness between the treatments (χ = 42.2, P < 0.0001, and χ = 49.9, P < 0.0001, respectively, df = 3).
There was no significant difference in attractiveness rating between front and oblique view, F 1, 130) = 1.54, p < .30 and between front and side view, p < .80.80
We then tested whether the condition at the second trial (i.e. neutral or altruistic), and the length of the relationship being considered, affected the difference in attractiveness ratings between the trials.
This figure is substantially larger than the difference in BMI between the target women necessary to produce a difference in attractiveness judgements.
He guessed that future research "will show a difference in attractiveness, if we have a larger sample size, and just analyze attractiveness alone".
There was no difference in attractiveness of the acquaintances versus partners (t(28) = −0.35, p = 0.73).
The observed differences in aphid numbers are unlikely only the result of a difference in attractiveness of the plants.
To control for differences in attractiveness of DCE scenarios, dummies were added for scenarios to equation (1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com