Although we observed a 35% overall median difference between the repeat measurements, only 4% were classified into different classes than their repeat pair by the classification algorithm.
Although no significant difference was observed between the pre-treatment and repeated treatments in case of IL-1β, there was a significant difference between the repeated SZR72 treated group and control groups.
Thus, across the experiment, the only difference between the repeated and novel primes was that each repeated prime appeared as the target on 10% of the trials.
The median overall difference of d i 2 is 0.12, a median of 0.12 = 35% difference between the repeat measurements.
Overall, the mean difference between the repeated measurements was 0.018 cm2 with upper and lower confidence limits of 0.435 cm2 and -0.470 cm, respectively, suggesting minimal systematic bias between the intra-reader measurements.
Here, the mean difference between the repeated measures was 0.157 cm, with upper and lower confidence limits of 0.299 cm2 and -0.613 cm, indicating that the first reader's measurements are on average slightly higher than the second reader's measurements.
Moreover, the root mean square differences between the repeated waveforms of both variables were very small, compared with their ranges (fascicle length: RMS = ∼3 mm, range: 38 63 mm; pennation angle: RMS = ∼1.5°, range: 22 32°).
The latter shows the differences between the repeated samples and the original ones (generated for each hour without QoD) with a maximum error of 5%, representing the darkest areas.
Moreover, the reproducibility of this method was confirmed by the small differences between the repeated superimpositions on the anterior cranial base.
