Sentence examples for difference between the rapid from inspiring English sources

The experimental result shows that the area gain of expanded skin surface had no significant difference between the rapid and conventional expansion.

The poorer the sorting, the higher the compaction rate and the more distinct the difference between the rapid compaction stage and the slow compaction stage.

Adsorption onto an sp 2-bonded carbon occurs through weak dispersive forces; however, at a defect such as a carboxylic acid group, single- and double-hydrogen bonds allow binding energies of at least several hundred millielectron volts/molecule, the main difference between the rapid and slow responses.

There was no evidence of a difference between the rapid and standard rehydration groups in the proportions of participants who were rehydrated at two hours (41/114 (36%) v 33/112 (30%); difference 6.5%95%5% confidence interval −5.7% to 18.7%; P=0.32).

There was no difference between the rapid diagnostic test arm and the clinical diagnosis arm in the proportions of cases of confirmed malaria that were not treated, nor evidence that introducing antimalarial treatment targeted by rapid diagnostic tests where treatment is presumptive increased mortality in children or care seeking 28 days later.

The forest residue chain is also contributed to by small amounts of fossil fuel used in harvesting and transport, but also by differences between the rapid emissions from residue combustion in energy production and slow decomposition in the forest floor in the reference case.

There was a significant difference between the sensitivities of the rapid test between age groups, 56.9% among patients 2 18 years of age and 22.2% among patients > 18 years of age (P = 0.0001).

The difference is the rapid flooding that occurred at Fukushima.

Because consumers account for such a large proportion of all economic activity, a shift of just 1 or 2percentt between spending and saving can make the difference between rapid growth or recession for the entire economy.

Although the majority claimed to know the difference between rapid sequence and classic induction (93.3, 63.7 and 89.5 for ANEST, PNEUMO and ER, P = 0.02), they did not correctly point out those differences (mean note – 2.28 ± 0.92, 2.1 ± 0.87 and 1.9 ± 0.75, respectively, for ANEST, PNEUMO and ER, P = 0.379).

These designs exploit the differences in the temporal characteristics between the rapid motion-induced and the slower hemodynamic signal changes.