Although it is not possible to quantitatively compare the results obtained from the TALEN-I2, CRISPR-I3 and -I4 due to the differences between the performed assays (loss of restriction site and Surveyor), CRISPR-I3 seemed to show the greatest cutting efficiency.
The mean difference between the superimpositions performed by the two observers ranged between 0.02 and 0.05 mm for the four anatomical regions.
Another difference between the sampling performed in 2007 and 2008 (and 2009), was that pathogen testing changed to focus on the detection of a single pathogen, Renibacterium salmoninarum (causative agent of bacterial kidney disease, BKD).
The difference between the simulations performed on the HET and DYN representations are larger for faster propagations, consistently with the results of Ref. [ 49], according to which a very fast (deterministic) spreading phenomenon can result in very different patterns on static and dynamic network representations.
Regarding survival, the difference between the best performing single-therapy group 3 (TMZ) and group 4 (TMZ 14 days after 177Lu-TATE) was significant (p = 0.046), whereas the other combination groups performed even better.
We conclude this section by noting the similarity and differences between the analysis performed in ref. [38].
Mean differences between the superimpositions performed by the first and second observer were 0.02 mm (SD 0.1) for the anterior cranial base, 0.05 mm (SD 0.05) for the forehead region, −0.04 mm (SD 0.18) for the right zygomatic arch and 0.02 mm (SD 0.14) for the left zygomatic arch.
Note, however, that this contrast does not control for many nonconceptual differences between the task performed by subjects (e.g., reading words and making meaning-relatedness judgments) and the fixation baseline condition.
The significance of QALY and cost differences between treatments was assessed conservatively by estimating 0.25 0.75 percentiles for the QALY and cost differences between treatments in the performed 2000 model simulations.
For example, one student wrote, "it develops my ability to evaluate other people's work and realise what works and what we need to improve", and another found it valuable to "see the difference between performing the same thing both online and on stage".
