Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The evaluation for male and female separately showed no clear difference between the evaluated parameters.
Similar(59)
The results of the simulations show that there are small differences between the evaluated cases regarding effectiveness.
The other reason could be the inclusion of relatively low number of animals together with high inter-individual variation, resulting in an absence of significant differences between the evaluated groups.
The major observations are related to the differences between evaluating the tool itself (macro-evaluation), evaluating the process of producing the tool (meta-evaluation), and evaluating products developed with this tool (micro-evaluation).
The significance of the difference between groups was evaluated with the Student's t-test or one-way ANOVA.
The significance of the difference between groups was evaluated with the Student's t-test, p < 0.05 was considered significant.
The difference between groups was evaluated using the Student t-test.
The difference between proportions was evaluated by the χ test with Yates' correction, when necessary.
RFS was generated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and the difference between curves was evaluated with the Log-rank test.
There was no statistical difference between the adhesive protocols evaluated.
The difference between the effective efficiency evaluated by the two laboratories was less than 0.5% at all frequency points.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com