In contrast, the groups did not differ in the scale of Bodily Pain or in Physical functioning (PCS).
All models have a binomial errors structure but differ in the scale of the explanatory variable (CONC., i.e. ammonia concentration, linear vs. log-transformed), or the link function of the linear predictor (logit vs. probit vs. complementary log-log).
In contrast, the two species did not differ in the scales measuring their understanding of problems related to spatial comprehension, discriminating quantities, using and comprehending communicative signals and learning from others via a social demonstration.
Apart from changing the length of the answering scale, the two scales also differed in the number of labelled categories.
Furthermore, studies differed in the design of the response scales, including the wording of the items, and combined results for pharmacists from a variety of practice settings (i.e., community, primary care, academia, hospital, and long-term care).
Because the judges differed in the way they used the scoring scale (some being more conservative than others), the 0 10 score was converted to a 0 1 scale (1 corresponding to the maximal rate given over 10 by each judge), with a resulting average resemblance score of 0.93/1.
These three systems differ in the spatial scale of production and consumption and with that comes a different distribution of environmental, social and economic impacts.
If the patterns only differ in the intensity scaling of a common pattern, then best classification accuracy should be achieved with a classifier that uses only the most informative pattern component of the training data set.
The groups differed in several scale scores at T1 (Table 3).
Herein, we observed that the apoptotic response of germ cells to DXR differed in scale depending on the mouse strain as well as age of the female.
