Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(14)
Furthermore, the expression of total PDK-1 (both phosphorylated and unphosphorylated) negligibly differed among all TMA tissues, indicating the differences in the degree and frequency of phosphorylation was more likely resulted from differential phosphorylation levels rather than quantitative variations (top row of Figure 1).
Portal uptake of propanol accounted for 48 to 61% of ingested propanol and differed among all 3 treatments C ≪ PPA < P.
Interaction in richness occurred by significantly higher values in deciduos forests than in mixed and evergreen forests in coast sites (Fig. 2), while in mountain, richness significantly differed among all forest types following the gradient evergreen < mixed < deciduous.
Rate of parental feeding visits to the nest during the nestling period differed among all four sites (F3,37 = 19.274, p<0.0001) with bellbirds on Aorangi (no predators present) visiting nests more frequently than at either Waiman Bush (predators removed) or Kowhai Bush (predators present; Figure 4).
aPIP differed among all three modes.
Ovary development differed among all three groups (Kruskall-Wallis rank sums, p < 0.0016, nonparametric Tukey-Kramer HSD, p < 0.05).
Similar(46)
However expression of PRMT1 and GSK3β/p-GSK3β did not differ among all groups (all P > 0.05).
Mortality by day 28 did not significantly differ among all three predefined strata (p = .52).52
However, the observation that OsBiP1, OsPDIL1; 1 and calnexin protein levels did not significantly differ among all lines suggests that the ER protein folding and transport system was not disrupted in the transgenic rice seed cells.
When plants were elicited by wounding and immediately applying caterpillar regurgitant to the wounds, the elicitation of JA and JA-Ile/Leu conjugates did not differ among all genotypes (JA: ANOVA; F6,14: 0.664; P = 0.681; JA-Ile/Leu: ANOVA; F6,14: 0.997; P = 0.465, Fig. S1).
Sex distribution did not differ among all groups, whereas cigarette smoking was more frequent in nonobese insulin-sensitive subjects than all other groups.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com