If mutational properties inferred from MA differ from the standing genetic variation in a group of interest, the most straightforward interpretation is that some evolutionary force other than mutation (i.e., selection and/or drift) has influenced the standing variation.
Other sorts of capitals are however placed on these columns, which, differing in proportion, and standing on a different sort of shaft, cannot be referred to any other class; but their origin, though the detail be changed, is traced to, and deduced from the Corinthian, the Ionic, and the Doric, their only differences arising from a variation of the arrangement of the sculpture on them.
In so far the effects of WBV in standing posture differ to a large extent from the stereotypic time courses of WBV effects in completely unloaded muscles in our study.
When underlying co-morbidities were excluded from the analyses, the results remained the same; e.g. HF power, SD1, and α1 in standing position differed significantly between the groups after adjustments (p = 0.048, p = 0.012 and p = 0.010, respectively).
Here we compared two characters that show similar patterns of standing variation in a population, but differ in an important aspect of their developmental determination.
Though these two characters show similar patterns of standing variation and covariation within a population, they differ in key features of their underlying development.
Real societies differ in several ways; they have more complex interactions, more complex communication, and nuanced differences between reputation and moral standing.
These differ in every country.
We differ in that approach.
Experts differ in their opinions.
Flours differ in their absorbency.
