We have decided not to report the results of approximately unbiased test [ 35] because we have realized that the test behaves very unstably for our data sets; re-testing of the same data sets produced very different p-values that sometimes differed in significance.
Partial correlations were used in order to control for depression severity, and no associations differed in significance or strength when controlling for depression severity.> -wrap-foot>> -wrap-fooTheThETQ and TSSscaleale scores are derived by the summing of raw scores of the individual items that load on that construct, including reverse scoring for negative loaded items.
Given that individuals with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder differ in the significance of their mood symptoms, the present research examined whether the association between emotional awareness and delusions differs for these two groups of patients.
Frege pointed out that sentences containing co-referential expressions like 'Hesperus' and 'Phosphorus' can differ in cognitive significance: someone who is competent with these two names may not realize they are co-referential and may therefore use them differently in making and justifying claims.
Although a balanced response seems most likely to be associated with a good outcome, it is probable that predominantly vascular and predominantly metabolic responses will differ in clinical significance.
In the current study, negative impact of BCL-2 expression on CR was demonstrated in the TP53-negative carcinomas only, confirming our hypothesis that TP53-positive and TP53-negative ovarian carcinomas differ in clinical significance of apoptosis proteins interacting with TP53 in tumour response to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.
Furthermore, the methods are either limited to boundary representations with the smallest misorientation angles or take into account all symmetrically equivalent boundary representations, and these two approaches differ in their meaning, physical significance and conclusions.
This is then supposed to provide us with a way of resisting the argument's conclusion i.e., the claim that the experiences involved in genuine perception and hallucination do not differ in their epistemic significance.
What the disjunctive account does achieve, though, is to show we can resist sceptical arguments that appeal to the "highest common factor" conception of experience that conception of experience according to which genuine perceptions and subjectively indistinguishible hallucinations do not differ in their epistemological significance.
