Sentence examples for differ in emphasis from inspiring English sources

Both candidates agree that the economy — inflation, the stock market situation, the cost of living — is a major issue, but they differ in emphasis.

The programs and centers differ in emphasis, with some concentrating on American democratic and capitalist institutions and others on the Western canon, the great books often derided during the culture wars as the history of "dead white men". They sponsor colloquia, seminars, courses, visiting lecturers and postdoctoral students.

However, in Borough of Duryea v. Guarnieri, a Petition Clause case decided last year, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote that there could be cases "where the special concerns of the Petition Clause would provide a sound basis for a distinct analysis" and where the rights of petition and free speech "might differ in emphasis and formulation".

This reinforces the conclusion that while levels may differ in emphasis on specific competencies; there will not be dramatic contrasts in the results overall.

Then they differ in emphasis: Mary focuses on the role of the Muslim Brotherhood since for 90 years they've been pushing for a more Islamic state while Arianna distinguishes Iran since there are no mullahs or ayatollah ready to seize power.

Mr. Rothman and Mr. Gianopulos said today that while their movie careers had differed in emphasis -- Mr. Rothman has more of a creative and production background and Mr. Gianopulos more of a concentration in distribution and the business side -- they intended to fully share the duties of running the studio.

Current theoretical explanations of visual hallucinations, while differing in emphasis, broadly agree that impairments in both visual perception and attention are implicated (Collerton & Mosimann, 2010).

These mission statements often have many points in common (e.g., crime prevention is usually a high priority), while differing in emphasis according to the political or philosophical leanings of the jurisdiction on certain issues, such as immigration enforcement and civil liberties priorities.

It is tempting to see the difference between (Saunders-Wallace) decoherence-based many-worlds and (Zeh) decoherence-based many-minds as merely conventional, since they arguably both share an ontology of global wave functions and local (perhaps emergent) minds, and only differ in the emphasis they place on different objectively present structures in the same decohering wave function.

Broad consensus exists regarding the effectiveness of most interventions, but current recommendations differ in the emphasis they place on different strategies.

But Tadie and Carter differ in style, emphasis and intended readership.