The phrase "differ in approach" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use it when you want to describe two different ways of dealing with a situation or topic. For example: "Our two teams differ in approach when it comes to developing a successful marketing strategy."
No single blueprint for the service exists: services differ in approach, location, skill-mix of staff and numbers of people supported.
These books differ in approach and tone, but they share the assumption that Kaufman was an important figure, whose work mattered.
Representatives Cole, Culberson share enthusiasm for research, but differ in approach.
Both The Eolian Harp and Reflections deal with similar understandings of nature but differ in approach.
A small but telling example that demonstrates how the books and movies differ in approach is when the Gryffindor boys experiment with candy that gives them the ability to sound like animals.
There are two other recently developed dyspnoea instruments that take account of the multidimensional nature of dyspnoea, the Dyspnoea-12 (D-12) [ 85– 87] and the Cancer Dyspnoea Scale CDSS) [ 88], but these differ in approach, aiming principally at a summary score, rather than at the separation of different components.
SMs (mean = 615, SD = 90) and HMs (mean = 612, SD = 90) did not differ in mean overall reaction time, neither did the two groups differ in approach-avoidance tendencies towards the non-social control pictures (mean = −20 (SD = 84) for SMs and mean = −14 (SD = 97) for HMs).
"Our current system, which differs in approach but is uniform in its ineptitude, is antediluvian," said Senator Charles E. Schumer, Democrat of New York, co-sponsor of one of the measures.
Series creator Chris Carter has described the character in terms of his relationship with The Smoking Man, noting that the two characters can be seen as "differing in approach, differing in philosophy and differing in personality".
These simulations differed in approach from other cellular automata developed around the same time, which focused on cells and the relationships between them.
Although these examples differed in approach, both recognised the need to address broader structural factors to create an enabling environment within which individual behaviour change could occur.
