Sentence examples for differ from systematic from inspiring English sources

However, the sides of these apparent spirals have random lengths and therefore differ from systematic spiral searching patterns which have, for example, been observed in the desert isopod Hemilepistus reaumuri upon getting lost after an excursion from its burrow [21] and in desert ants (Cataglyphis) when returning to the nest after forging beyond the range of the known landmark map [22].

Pooled analyses differ from systematic reviews that utilize meta-analysis as part of the synthesis of evidence (e.g. DERP reports) and potentially introduce bias.

Scoping reviews generally differ from systematic reviews: (1) by addressing broader and more heterogeneous questions; (2) by including studies of many different methodological designs; and (3) by not necessarily assessing the quality of the included studies [ 11- 15, 16, 16].

Scoping reviews differ from systematic reviews, in that the focus is not on the assessment of quality as defined within a biomedical research paradigm [ 39], rather, the approach enables a broader range of literature to be captured, including all types of study designs [ 37].

Scoping reviews can also incorporate a range of evidence types, but differ from a systematic review in that the evidence is summarised to provide an overview, or map, of the available evidence, rather than a set of synthesised findings (Arksey and O'Malley 2005).

It is noteworthy that our judgments regarding the risk of bias in some studies differed from previous systematic reviews [ 5].

Third, a meta-analysis of these data could not be conducted as planned a priori, which differs from another systematic review on this topic [ 60].

Scoping reviews differ from other types of systematic reviews in that they provide a broad map of the existing literature without meta-analyses of the data.

To collate and summarise the literature on the principles of good practice in realist and meta-narrative reviews, highlighting in particular how and why these differ from conventional forms of systematic review and from each other.

Individuals who volunteer to participate in clinical research studies often differ from non-volunteers in systematic ways (e.g., higher socioeconomic status; Szklo and Nieto 2006); and this restricts our ability to draw inference about the wider population.

The results from this systematic review differ from the literature review of Mcilvoy [ 26], who concluded that brain temperature is predominantly higher than body temperature.