Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
During weeks 9 to 16 of lactation, the cows receiving diet H maintained a higher feed intake and milk yield similar to that observed in the first 8 weeks of lactation.
Diet and milking frequency had no effect on the TNF-α response ex vivo or CD14 expression level on monocytes, but cows fed diet H had significantly higher numbers of CD14+ monocytes than cows fed diet L. The WBA with LPS was a fast reliable method for repeated measurements of TNF-α responsiveness in cattle.
During weeks 0 to 8, the cows receiving diet H had a 4.2 units higher net energy intake (Scandinavian feed units), and a 15% higher milk yield compared with the cows receiving diet L. The cows being milked three times a day had an 8% higher daily milk yield, without an increase in DMI, than the cows milked twice a day.
Subjects raised on a high quality diet (H) grew faster than subjects on a low quality diet (L) resulting in significant differences in all biometric traits at day 17 and at day 35 on wing length (Table 1).
One group of hamsters was given a normal diet (N) and 7 groups of hamsters were given a high fat high cholesterol diet (H).
On a high-fat diet, h IL6tg mice were lean, had low leptin concentrations, consumed less food and expended more energy than wild-type mice.
Similar(53)
Diets L and Li showed a higher (P<0.05) proportion of acetic acid in ileal digesta compared to diets H and Hi.
Diets H and Hi had a high total NSP content, and by starch dilution, the resulting diets L and Li had a low total NSP content.
Four geldings in a Latin Square design were fed 4 diets: (H) timothy hay, (OB) whole oats and molassed sugar beet pulp (Betfor®), (BB) whole barley and Betfor®, chaff based concentrate (M).
The latter effect was associated with a shorter duration in which rumen pH was below 5.8 for cows fed the TRT diet (2.4 h) compared with CTR diet (3.9 h).
Both the groups received restricted diet (20 g/12 h).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com