Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Despite increased control activities, malaria did not substantially decline.
Similar(59)
Varying the boosting iterations between 10 and 20 did not substantially alter the results and produced a decline outside of the range.
However this parameter is mostly involved in the initial rate of viral decline and thus a poor estimation of c did not substantially deteriorate the estimation of the other parameters (Table 2).
Knowledge of result did not substantially modify these effects.
Adjustment for smoking did not substantially change this estimate.
Further increase stimulus intensity did not substantially alter this window.
Urinary subscores did not substantially change.
Glycosylation did not substantially affect the digestion.
But, main results did not substantially change.
Other covariates did not substantially affect the OR values.
Additionally considering alcohol intake did not substantially change this estimate.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com