Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The major difference between the two studies is the fact that Caminschi et al. found that the inclusion of adjuvant did not substantially boost Ab titers, whereas in our case, we see a massive increase.
Similar(59)
Varying the boosting iterations between 10 and 20 did not substantially alter the results and produced a decline outside of the range.
Further increase stimulus intensity did not substantially alter this window.
Knowledge of result did not substantially modify these effects.
Adjustment for smoking did not substantially change this estimate.
Urinary subscores did not substantially change.
Glycosylation did not substantially affect the digestion.
But, main results did not substantially change.
Age did not substantially confound the results of the scan.
Excluding community controls did not substantially change estimates.
Updating the intercept only did not substantially improve this miscalibration.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com