Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

did not recieve

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not recieve" is not correct in written English.
The correct spelling is "receive." You can use it when discussing something that was expected but not obtained, but ensure to use the correct spelling. Example: "I did not receive the email you sent last week."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

She did not receive one.

News & Media

Independent

They did not receive a warm welcome.

News & Media

The New York Times

He did not receive a response.

News & Media

The New York Times

It did not receive a reduction.

News & Media

The New York Times

He did not receive jail time.

But she did not receive special treatment.

News & Media

The New York Times

The bank did not receive TARP funds.

News & Media

The New York Times

Spinal groups did not receive supplementary sedation.

Group 1 did not receive corticosteroids.

Group 2 patients did not receive metformin.

They did not receive cooperation".

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always double-check your spelling, especially with commonly misspelled words like "receive". Using a spell checker can help prevent this error.

Common error

The most common mistake is misspelling "receive" as "recieve". Remember the rule: 'i' before 'e', except after 'c'. Train yourself to recognise the correct spelling to avoid this error.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not recieve" functions as a negative past tense verb phrase, aiming to convey the absence of receipt. Although a misspelling, the intended grammatical function is to negate the action of receiving.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

42%

Wiki

7%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Academia

2%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "did not recieve" is frequently used across various contexts like News & Media and Science, it's crucial to note that this is a misspelling of "did not receive". As Ludwig AI points out, the correct spelling is 'receive' and using the incorrect form can detract from your writing, especially in formal or professional settings. Therefore, while the meaning is generally understood, it is advisable to use the correct spelling or consider alternative phrases like "did not get" or "failed to receive" for clarity and professionalism.

FAQs

How do I properly spell "did not recieve"?

The correct spelling is "did not receive". The word "receive" follows the rule 'i before e, except after c'.

What's a good alternative to saying "did not receive"?

You can use alternatives like "did not get", "failed to receive", or "did not obtain" depending on the context.

Is "did not recieve" grammatically correct?

No, "did not recieve" is not grammatically correct. It's a misspelling of "did not receive".

What is the difference between "did not receive" and "was not given"?

"Did not receive" generally means something was not obtained. "Was not given" implies that someone else failed to provide something.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

2.8/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: