did not modify

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not modify" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something was not changed or altered in a particular context. Example: "The software update did not modify any of the existing settings, ensuring a smooth transition for users."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Corbyn did not modify Labour's position, either.

The New Yorker

However, TFS did not modify the ADT.

Epilepsy & Behavior

Results: Placebo did not modify any vascular or metabolic parameter.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Betaine, however, did not modify milk SCC during lactation.

Small Ruminant Research

These factors, however, did not modify the outcome.

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

The simulated training session did not modify VT1 occurrence.

Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Fibers proportion did not modify microbiological and sensory indices.

LWT

The latter did not modify aroma and taste perception.

Food Quality and Preference

Silicon introduction into CrN-based coatings did not modify their preferred orientation.

Surface and Coatings Technology

Increasing the heating rate up to 150 K min−1 did not modify the densification mechanism.

Acta Materialia

It is found that acoustic resonance did not modify the static fluid force.

Journal of Sound and Vibration

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "did not modify" in scientific writing, clearly state what was expected to cause a modification and what remained unchanged. This adds precision to your findings.

Common error

Ensure that the context makes it clear what "did not modify" what. Vague statements can lead to confusion about the subject and object of the lack of modification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not modify" functions as a verb phrase indicating the absence of change or alteration. Ludwig AI shows that it's used to negate the action of modifying, specifying that something remained in its original state. Its role is to state that something was not changed by a particular action or influence.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

67%

Academia

22%

News & Media

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not modify" is a common and grammatically correct expression used to indicate the absence of change or alteration. As Ludwig AI confirms, it frequently appears in scientific and academic contexts. When using this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what was expected to cause the modification. Related phrases like "did not alter" or "remained unchanged" can offer variety in writing. This expression serves to communicate a lack of impact or change in a clear and direct manner.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not alter

Focuses on preventing change, stressing that something remained untouched in its original form.

did not change

A simple and direct way of saying that something stayed the same.

remained the same

Emphasizes the continuation of a consistent state.

was not affected

Indicates that something was not influenced or impacted by an external factor.

did not affect

Points out the absence of impact, influence, or alteration from something.

was not influenced

Highlights the absence of external pressure or change.

did not impact

Expresses a lack of influence or effect on something.

persisted unchanged

Shows the continuity of something without any alterations or disruptions.

was maintained

Highlights the effort or conditions that kept something in its original state.

held constant

Stresses deliberate action taken to preserve something at a fixed level or state.

FAQs

How can I use "did not modify" in a sentence?

Use "did not modify" to state that a specific action or factor did not alter something. For instance, "The new policy did not modify the existing regulations".

What's a formal alternative to "did not modify"?

A more formal alternative is "did not alter", which conveys a similar meaning but with a slightly more elevated tone.

Is it always necessary to specify what "did not modify" something?

Yes, providing context about what was expected to cause a change helps clarify your statement and avoids ambiguity. Without it, the sentence might lack necessary detail.

How does "did not modify" differ from "remained unchanged"?

"Did not modify" implies an action or attempt to change something that failed, whereas "remained unchanged" simply states that something stayed the same without implying an attempted change.