did not causes

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not causes" is not correct in written English.
It should be "did not cause" as "did" requires the base form of the verb. Example: "The changes in the policy did not cause any significant impact on the community."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The test compounds 5a, 5b, 5c, 5d and 5e did not causes any mortality up to dose of 100 mg/kg.

Chemistry Central Journal

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

We did not cause this.

Independent

Ixtoc did not cause major onshore damage.

The New York Times - Science

Countrywide did not cause this problem.

The New York Times

The crash did not cause the Depression.

The New Yorker

That quake did not cause any deaths.

Independent

It did not cause the killings.

The Guardian

Certainly she did not cause trouble.

The New York Times

Tax havens did not cause this crisis.

The Guardian - Opinion

I did not cause those injuries".

The Guardian

The rockets did not cause injuries.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Always use the base form of the verb after the auxiliary verb "did". The correct phrasing is "did not cause".

Common error

Avoid using the plural form of the verb after "did not". The phrase "did not causes" is grammatically incorrect. Use the base form: "did not cause".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not causes" functions as a verb phrase aiming to negate a causal relationship. As Ludwig AI points out, it is grammatically incorrect. It is meant to express that something was not the origin or reason for a particular result or event.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not causes" is a grammatically incorrect way to express the negation of a causal relationship. The correct form is "did not cause". As Ludwig AI highlights, the error lies in the use of the plural verb form "causes" after the auxiliary verb "did". While examples of the incorrect phrase exist, primarily in Science and News & Media contexts, it's crucial to use the correct grammatical form in writing and speech. Consider using alternatives like "did not lead to" or "was not the reason for" to ensure clarity and grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not cause

Corrects the grammatical error by using the base form of the verb after "did".

did not lead to

Uses a different verb to indicate the absence of a causal relationship.

did not result in

Similar to "did not lead to", but with a slightly more formal tone.

was not the reason for

Replaces "cause" with a more descriptive phrase.

did not bring about

Uses a phrasal verb to express the idea of not causing something.

was not responsible for

Indicates a lack of responsibility for an outcome.

is not the source of

Focuses on the origin or source of something.

cannot be attributed to

A more formal way of saying something was not the cause.

played no part in

Emphasizes the complete absence of influence.

had nothing to do with

An informal way of denying a connection.

FAQs

What is the correct way to say something did not lead to a specific outcome?

The correct phrasing is "did not cause". For instance, "The new policy "did not cause" any disruption".

What can I say instead of "did not causes"?

You can use alternatives like "did not lead to", "did not result in", or "was not the reason for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "did not causes" or "did not cause"?

The correct phrase is "did not cause". The auxiliary verb "did" requires the base form of the verb.

Is "did not causes" grammatically correct?

No, "did not causes" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is ""did not cause"".