did not cases

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "did not cases" is not correct and usable in written English.
It appears to be a grammatical error or a misphrasing, as it does not convey a clear meaning. Example: "The report did not cases any significant issues." (This is incorrect; it should be rephrased for clarity.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

The gene score was significantly higher among subjects who developed incident T2DM (cases) compared with those who did not (cases vs. noncases: 16.47 [2.50] vs. 15.99 [2.56]; P < 0.00001).

Diabetes Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

In general, APNs did not case manage those without a recent admission or multiple admissions.

BMC Health Services Research

"Don't case-officer me," superiors might say when they suspected shading of the facts.

The New York Times - Magazine

It did not include cases from Afghanistan.

The Washington Post

Preoperative renal imaging did not predict cases with abnormal cystoscopy.

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Self-reported hostility did not discriminate cases from controls.

Duke University

We did not test cases prior to clinically apparent disease.

Plosone

The study did not report cases of iatrogenic transmission.

Emerging Infectious Diseases

Of these, 56 did not meet case inclusion criteria.

Environmental Health: A Global Access Science Source

We did not include possible cases.

DMM Disease Models and Mechanisms

Marshall did not make his case alone.

The Washington Post

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "did not cases" in your writing. It is grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity. Opt for clearer and more precise alternatives such as "did not include cases" or "did not involve cases".

Common error

A common mistake is treating "cases" as a verb. Ensure you are using a correct verb form like "include", "involve", or "address" followed by "cases" as a noun to maintain grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "did not cases" is grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI identifies it as a misphrasing that requires correction. The intended function is often to negate the inclusion or involvement of specific instances, but it fails to do so effectively due to its flawed structure.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

25%

Formal & Business

15%

Less common in

Academia

10%

Wiki

10%

Encyclopedias

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "did not cases" is grammatically incorrect and should be avoided in writing. Ludwig AI analysis confirms this, identifying it as a misphrasing. While the intended meaning is often to negate the inclusion or involvement of specific instances, the phrase's flawed structure undermines its effectiveness. Correct alternatives include "did not include cases", "did not involve cases", or "did not address cases", depending on the context. Given its grammatical issues and the availability of clearer alternatives, it's best to refrain from using "did not cases" in both formal and informal communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

did not involve cases

Replaces "cases" with "involve cases" to provide a grammatically correct and clear alternative, focusing on the absence of specific instances.

did not include cases

Similar to the above, this rephrasing uses "include" to accurately convey that certain instances were excluded.

did not report instances

Substitutes "cases" with "instances" to maintain a similar meaning while improving grammatical correctness.

did not cover cases

Uses "cover" to indicate that certain situations were outside the scope of discussion or analysis.

did not address cases

Employs "address" to suggest that certain instances were not dealt with or considered.

did not investigate instances

Shifts the focus to the act of investigation, suggesting that certain instances were not examined.

did not examine cases

Uses "examine" to indicate that specific instances were not scrutinized or analyzed.

did not study cases

Replaces with "study" indicating cases were not subject of a particular investigation.

did not analyze instances

Replaces with "analyze" indicating cases were not subject of a data-driven investigation.

did not consider instances

Replaces with "consider" indicating cases were not taken into consideration in a particular investigation.

FAQs

How can I correctly use "cases" after "did not"?

Ensure you use a verb between "did not" and "cases" to form a grammatically correct sentence. For example, "did not include cases" or "did not involve cases".

What are some alternatives to the phrase "did not cases"?

You can use alternatives like "did not include cases", "did not involve cases", or "did not address cases" depending on the context.

Is "did not cases" grammatically correct?

No, "did not cases" is not grammatically correct. It is missing a verb to connect "did not" with the noun "cases".

What's the difference between "did not include cases" and "did not involve cases"?

"Did not include cases" suggests that certain instances were excluded from a set, while "did not involve cases" indicates that certain situations were not part of a process or investigation.