Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
did contributed to
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "did contributed to" is not correct in English.
The correct form would be "did contribute to." Example: "The research did contribute to our understanding of climate change."
⚠ May contain grammatical issues
News & Media
Wiki
Science
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
2 human-written examples
In May, Parexel issued a statement saying that the MHRA report concluded that "nothing Parexel did contributed to the adverse reactions experienced by the study participants", adding that it would not issue any further statements unless there are significant developments.
News & Media
Giants owner Wellington Mara stated, "I think the Jets coming in when they did contributed to our bad years, because we tried to do everything for the short term rather than the long haul we'd trade a draft choice for a player, figuring he'd give us one or two good years.
Wiki
Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources
Similar Expressions
58 human-written examples
But he did contribute to three election victories.
News & Media
The jury concluded it did contribute to the 23-year-old's death in 2013.
News & Media
While this was not investment this did contribute to long-term growth.
News & Media
However Duminy did contribute to the extraordinary dismissal of one of his own.
News & Media
In the end, Caro took no credit, though he did contribute to the film.
News & Media
"Viruses may well be the unseen creator that most likely did contribute to making us human".
News & Media
"The family did contribute to famine-relief funds but that was edited out of the show.
News & Media
I think we did contribute to the prevention of nuclear war".
News & Media
The results revealed that motivation, attention, and interactivity did contribute to the students' thinking skills.
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Always use the correct verb form after the auxiliary verb "did". The correct structure is "did + base form of the verb". Therefore, use "did contribute to" instead of "did contributed to".
Common error
Avoid using the past participle form of a verb after the auxiliary verb "did". The correct grammatical structure requires the base form of the verb. For instance, it is grammatically incorrect to say "did contributed". The right expression would be "did contribute to".
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "did contributed to" is generally intended to function as a verb phrase indicating that something played a part in bringing about a particular result. However, as noted by Ludwig AI, this construction is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "did contribute to."
Frequent in
News & Media
33%
Wiki
33%
Science
33%
Less common in
Formal & Business
0%
Encyclopedias
0%
Social Media
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, the phrase "did contributed to" is grammatically incorrect. The auxiliary verb "did" should be followed by the base form of the verb, making the correct phrase "did contribute to". While some instances of "did contributed to" can be found, as demonstrated by Ludwig, they are infrequent and appear in sources with varying levels of authority. As Ludwig AI also points out, always prefer "did contribute to", "played a role in", or similar alternatives to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
did contribute to
Corrects the grammatical error by using the base form of the verb after "did".
contributed to
Removes the auxiliary verb "did", implying past tense without explicitly stating it.
played a role in
Replaces "contributed to" with a more general expression of influence.
was a factor in
Suggests that something was one of several elements that influenced an outcome.
had an impact on
Indicates a strong effect on something.
was instrumental in
Highlights the essential role something played in achieving a result.
helped to cause
Emphasizes the role in bringing about a particular result, often negative.
led to
Focuses on the direct consequence of something.
affected
A more general term indicating influence or impact.
had a hand in
An idiomatic expression indicating involvement or contribution.
FAQs
What's the correct way to use "contribute" with the auxiliary verb "did"?
When using the auxiliary verb "did", the main verb should be in its base form. Therefore, the correct form is "did contribute to", not "did contributed to".
Is "did contributed to" grammatically correct?
No, "did contributed to" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "did contribute to". The auxiliary verb "did" requires the base form of the main verb.
What are some alternatives to "did contribute to"?
Alternatives include "played a role in", "was a factor in", or "had an impact on". These options convey the meaning of contributing without using the grammatically questionable phrase.
How does "did contribute to" differ in meaning from "contributed to"?
"Did contribute to" emphasizes the action more strongly than simply "contributed to". The use of "did" adds emphasis, highlighting the fact that something definitely played a part. While both express contribution, "did contribute to" is more emphatic.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
83%
Authority and reliability
2.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested