Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
dice coefficient
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
'dice coefficient' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to refer to a particular statistical measure of inter-rater agreement, also known as the Sørensen–Dice coefficient. For example, you might say, "We used the Dice coefficient to measure the level of agreement between two sets of survey responses."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
Alternative expressions(1)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The dice coefficient was on average 0.89 and 0.94 respectively.
Science
The quantitative comparison is made by the dice coefficient.
In order to measure segmentation success, the Dice coefficient was obtained as 89.3%.
Science
A mean accuracy of Dice coefficient obtained is 0.67 in total.
Science
Table 3 shows the results of measuring the similarity of two morphosyllables with the Dice coefficient and the improved Dice coefficient methods.
Performance was measured using the Jaccard index (J) and Dice coefficient.
Besides an Overlapping and Dice Coefficient, SubVIS includes the Jaccard Index as a similarity measure.
Science
We compare the similarity of each pair of morphosyllables according to the improved Dice coefficient.
So, using the improvement of the Dice coefficient, we have fDice("nguyen," "nguyn") = 0.727.
A Dice coefficient was then calculated on the results of this alignment.
Science
Dice coefficient [24] also called Sorensen, Czekannowski Hodgkin-Richards [25] or Morisita [26].
Science
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When reporting the "dice coefficient", always specify the data and method used to derive the coefficient to ensure reproducibility and proper interpretation.
Common error
Avoid assuming a high "dice coefficient" automatically implies practical significance. A high coefficient indicates strong overlap, but the context and magnitude of the data should also be considered.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "dice coefficient" functions as a noun phrase, specifically a technical term, often used within scientific and statistical contexts. It is a quantifiable measure. As Ludwig confirms, it is a correct and usable phrase.
Frequent in
Science
100%
Less common in
News & Media
0%
Formal & Business
0%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The term "dice coefficient" is a statistically sound and commonly used metric, as confirmed by Ludwig. It serves as a noun phrase, primarily within the scientific domain, to quantify the similarity between datasets. As a formal term, it's best suited for technical contexts, demanding precise and reproducible language. The examples from Ludwig underscore its frequent use in scientific publications, highlighting its role in ensuring objective assessments across various analytical studies. A high coefficient indicates a strong overlap, but practical significance should always be carefully considered alongside the context and magnitude of the data.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
sorensen-dice index
This alternative uses the full name of the metric, specifying the scientists credited with its development, for a more formal tone.
sorensen index
This alternative shortens the metric name, referring only to Sorensen, maintaining a formal tone.
similarity index
This term broadens the concept, referring to a general measure of similarity, applicable beyond specific methods.
similarity coefficient
This is a general term for any coefficient measuring similarity. It's broader than the specific "dice coefficient".
overlap index
Focuses on the degree of overlap between two sets or samples, a key aspect measured by the dice coefficient.
association measure
Highlights the statistical association between variables, similar to the dice coefficient's function.
resemblance coefficient
Emphasizes the degree of resemblance or similarity, offering a less technical alternative.
tversky index
This is a generalization of the Dice coefficient and the Tanimoto coefficient. It measures the overlap between two sets.
jaccard index
While related, the Jaccard index calculates similarity differently, focusing on the ratio of shared features to total features.
czekannowski index
This alternative provides a synonym for the Dice coefficient, using another name associated with the same metric.
FAQs
How is the "dice coefficient" calculated?
The "dice coefficient" is calculated as 2 times the number of common elements divided by the sum of the number of elements in each set. The formula is: 2|X ∩ Y| / (|X| + |Y|).
What does a high "dice coefficient" indicate?
A high "dice coefficient", close to 1, indicates a high degree of similarity and overlap between two sets. This often suggests strong agreement or accurate segmentation.
In what fields is the "dice coefficient" commonly used?
The "dice coefficient" is frequently used in image segmentation, natural language processing, and bioinformatics to measure the similarity between two samples or segmentations.
What are some alternatives to the "dice coefficient" for measuring similarity?
Alternatives to the "dice coefficient" include the "Jaccard index", cosine similarity, and Tversky index, each with its own nuances in how similarity is calculated.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested