"dialectical reasoning" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It refers to the process of logical argumentation and discussion, particularly in the context of exploring opposing viewpoints or resolving conflicting ideas. You can use "dialectical reasoning" in various contexts, such as in academic writing, debates, or discussions about complex topics. For example: - "The philosophers engaged in a rigorous exchange of dialectical reasoning to arrive at a deeper understanding of the concept of justice." - "The leaders of opposing political parties engaged in a heated debate, utilizing dialectical reasoning to defend their respective stances on the controversial issue." - "In her essay, the author employs dialectical reasoning to analyze the complexities of human nature and its impact on society."
Even if we don't know Talmud as such, its style of dialectical reasoning, and penetrating questions has come to characterise the Jews as a civilisation".
US dialectical reasoning is such that its "human rights activists" are happy to indulge Hizb-ut-Tahrir, the Islamist organisation accused of being behind violence in the Ferghana valley.
His theory of place and time as defining structures of the mind anticipates Kant, his dialectical reasoning prefigures Hegel.
The argument he presented (like Luther's response) did not involve a real philosophical debate conducted through dialectical reasoning.
Dialectic, like science (epistêmê), trades in logical inference; but science requires premises of a sort beyond the scope of ordinary dialectical reasoning.
One way to make this flow explicit is to extend the game with some (abstract sketch of) dialectical reasoning about the atomic formula.
Natural philosophy, however, as later scholastic writers often admitted, tended to fall short of this idea because of the merely "probable" status of many of its experiential principles; it then represented "dialectical" rather than demonstrative reasoning".
The coherentist may respond by denying that she ever intended to suggest that circular reasoning is a legitimate dialectical strategy.
It embraces what the ancients termed dialectics (the technique of discussion and debate by means of questions and answers, dealing especially with matters of opinion), which Aristotle analyzed in his Topics; it includes the reasoning that Aristotle qualified as dialectical, which he distinguished from the analytical reasoning of formal logic.
In more recent research (e.g. Yrjönsuuri [2009]; Catarina Dutilh-Novaes [2011]), scholars have thought that unlike twentieth century theories of counterfactual reasoning, obligationes are characteristically dynamic and dialectical.
In one study of a professional entry physiotherapy course, key clinical reasoning dimensions like reflective practice and dialectical thinking were found to be under-developed [ 27].
