Exact(51)
In the Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study, 1,123 asymptomatic individuals with type 2 diabetes were randomized to either screening with stress myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or no screening.
In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, 436 children and adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized to a treatment group that used CGM (N = 224), or a control group that used standard home blood glucose monitoring (N = 212) and completed 12 months of follow-up.
Five hundred forty-nine American-Indian men and women >40 years old with type 2 diabetes were randomized to 1 of 2 groups.
We extended these findings to the Diabetes Prevention Program, a clinical trial in which participants at high risk for diabetes were randomized to placebo, lifestyle modification or metformin for diabetes prevention.
After a 5-week run-in period including optimization of diabetes care and low-intensity exercise, 131 physically active adults with type 1 diabetes were randomized to two groups for 22 weeks: resistance training three times weekly, or waiting-list control.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with type 2 diabetes were randomized to undergo a five-session group diabetes education program with or without stress management training.
Similar(9)
Individuals with pre-diabetes and diabetes are randomized in the same group and it can be discussed whether the same decline in HbA1c can be expected in individuals with pre-diabetes.
55 patients with type 2 diabetes (61.6±5.9 years) on oral diabetes medication were randomized in a 2 2 1 ratio in 3 groups.
10 In this study, 3070 diabetes subjects were randomized to receive RR-bromocriptine or placebo (2 1) in addition to their usual diabetes therapy.
133 Hosomi and colleagues did a prospective randomized clinical trial of 98 patients with type 2 diabetes who were randomized to either enalapril 10 mg/d (n = 48) or to a control group (n = 50) for 2 years.
Patients, naive or treated with conventional diabetes therapy, were randomized 1 1 to receive liraglutide or placebo, and followed up to 5 years after randomization.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com