devoid of visionaries

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "devoid of visionaries" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation, organization, or environment that lacks innovative thinkers or forward-looking individuals. Example: "The company's recent decisions reflect a culture that is devoid of visionaries, leading to stagnation in growth and creativity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

Microsoft isn't devoid of visionaries, though.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

59 human-written examples

Devoid of social value.

The New York Times

Devoid of all dismay.

Independent

Devoid of any empathy.

The New York Times

Oddly devoid of people.

The New York Times

Teenagers seem devoid of wonder.

The New York Times - Magazine

It's energetic but devoid of texture.

The New York Times - Arts

"Too many were devoid of much character".

The New York Times - Food

It was quiet, utterly devoid of torment.

The New York Times

I was devoid of emotion".

The Guardian

Footballers: entirely devoid of personality.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "devoid of visionaries", ensure that the context clearly establishes what area or group is lacking in visionary leadership. This provides a stronger and more impactful statement.

Common error

Avoid using "devoid of visionaries" in casual conversations or informal writing. The phrase carries a formal tone and is more suitable for analytical or critical contexts.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "devoid of visionaries" functions as an adjectival phrase, modifying a noun (often implied) to describe something that lacks visionary individuals. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and usability. It highlights a deficiency in innovative leadership, as seen in the example from The New Yorker.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Science

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "devoid of visionaries" is a grammatically correct and usable expression to describe the absence of innovative thinkers, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. While relatively rare, it's found in neutral contexts, mainly in news and media. Alternatives include phrases like "lacking in visionaries" or "bereft of visionaries", each carrying slight nuances. When using this phrase, ensure clarity in what you're describing and avoid it in overly informal situations. The phrase serves to highlight the lack of visionary leadership often with critical undertones.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking in visionaries

Focuses on the absence of visionaries, using a simpler structure.

bereft of visionaries

Implies a sense of loss or deprivation of visionaries.

without any visionaries

Directly states the absence of visionaries.

an absence of visionaries

Emphasizes the lack as a noticeable deficiency.

wanting in visionaries

Highlights the inadequacy in terms of visionary leadership.

missing visionaries

Suggests that visionaries are absent where they should be present.

devoid of innovative thinkers

Replaces "visionaries" with a synonymous phrase, broadening the scope.

lacking forward-thinking leaders

Specifies the type of leaders that are absent.

an organization without innovation leaders

Highlights organizational structure lacks in visionary roles.

a complete vacuum of visionaries

Uses "vacuum" for emphasis, stressing total absence.

FAQs

How can I use "devoid of visionaries" in a sentence?

You can use "devoid of visionaries" to describe a company, team, or era that lacks innovative leaders. For example: "The company's recent decisions reflect a culture that is devoid of visionaries, leading to stagnation in growth and creativity."

What are some alternatives to "devoid of visionaries"?

Alternatives include phrases like "lacking in visionaries", "bereft of visionaries", or "without any visionaries", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

Is it appropriate to use "devoid of visionaries" in a positive context?

Generally, "devoid of visionaries" carries a negative connotation, implying a lack or deficiency. It would be unusual to use it in a positive context. However, it could be used ironically or satirically.

What is the difference between "devoid of visionaries" and "lacking vision"?

"Devoid of visionaries" specifically refers to the absence of individuals with visionary qualities. "Lacking vision", on the other hand, describes a lack of strategic foresight or planning, which could be due to various factors, not necessarily just the absence of visionary people.