devoid of facts

USAGE SUMMARY

"devoid of facts" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to describe something that lacks evidence or supporting information. For example, "The report was completely devoid of facts and offered no real insight."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

The Indiana Supreme Court unanimously threw out the conviction in 1963 on the ground that the trial record had been "devoid of facts and circumstances" establishing a conspiracy.

The New York Times

In Cleveland, Mr. Trump led his party down a path devoid of facts, despite the grieving parents offered up as evidence that all immigrants are killers and despite former New York Mayor Rudolph Giuliani's screams about the end of America.

The New York Times

2. The argument which attacks the jurisdiction of the court upon the ground that the complaint is devoid of facts showing any matter which vests jurisdiction goes rather to the sufficiency of the pleading than to the jurisdiction of the court.

Cornell University

"This bill is devoid of facts, scientific data or any input from or consideration given to HCCB," it said.

BBC

Technology then exacerbates the problem, with our Facebook and Twitter feeds creating an echo-chamber of judgments that are often complete devoid of facts.

Forbes

During a Politico event last week, Spicer said the publication, in many cases, covers Republicans in a "tweet-happy" style that's "devoid of facts".

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

Every single assertion is based on hearsay and is totally devoid of fact.

The Guardian

Vacuity, vanity and frivolity, decked out with decrepit jokes but devoid of fact: more of this stuff will discredit him further with every outing.

The Guardian - Opinion

Charter school advocates are well-versed in their talking points, but those points are often devoid of fact.

HuffPost

The Met's galleries and Web site are mysteriously devoid of recent facts about the provenance of many artifacts.

The New York Times

A different judge reviewed the ranch's claims and rejected them late last week, saying the motion was devoid of "concrete facts evidencing bias". The case will reconvene in April.

Los Angeles Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "devoid of facts", ensure the context clearly indicates what specific facts are missing. This strengthens your critique and prevents ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "devoid of facts" when the subject contains some factual elements, even if incomplete. Instead, specify the areas where facts are lacking to maintain accuracy and credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "devoid of facts" functions as an adjective phrase, modifying a noun by indicating a complete absence of factual content. The phrase emphasizes the lack of supporting information or evidence. The Ludwig AI also confirms its grammatically correct usage.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Academia

20%

Science

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "devoid of facts" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to describe something lacking factual information or evidence. According to Ludwig, it serves to criticize or highlight the absence of factual support in arguments or reports. While predominantly found in news and media contexts, its neutral-to-formal register allows for use in academic or professional settings. For alternatives, consider phrases like "lacking factual basis" or "without evidence" for similar but nuanced meanings. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity about the specific missing facts to avoid ambiguity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

lacking factual basis

Emphasizes the absence of a foundation in facts.

unsubstantiated

Highlights the lack of evidence to support a claim.

without evidence

Directly points out the absence of supporting evidence.

factually empty

Stresses that the content contains no facts.

bereft of data

Focuses on the absence of data to support an argument.

groundless

Suggests a lack of any reasonable basis or foundation.

unfounded

Implies that the claim has no valid foundation.

without foundation

Similar to unfounded, stressing the lack of a base.

lacking substantiation

Emphasizes the lack of proof or validation.

evidence-free

A more informal way of saying without evidence.

FAQs

How can I use "devoid of facts" in a sentence?

You can use "devoid of facts" to describe arguments, reports, or statements that lack evidence or supporting information. For example, "The politician's speech was completely devoid of facts."

What is a good alternative to "devoid of facts"?

Alternatives include "lacking factual basis", "unsubstantiated", or "without evidence", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "lacking facts" or "devoid of facts"?

"Devoid of facts" is generally stronger and implies a complete absence, while "lacking facts" suggests that some facts may be present but insufficient. The best choice depends on the specific context and the degree of absence you want to emphasize.

What's the difference between "devoid of facts" and "unsupported by evidence"?

"Devoid of facts" focuses on the absence of factual information itself, while "unsupported by evidence" emphasizes the lack of backing for a claim or statement. While similar, the former directly addresses the missing facts, and the latter focuses on the lack of validation.