Sentence examples for device outcome from inspiring English sources

It is justifiable to mention that the device outcome reported herein provides strong support and incentive for the current research strategy, and that the conjoint use of potential acceptor building blocks, such as naphthalenediimide and benzoisoquinoline-dione, can indeed generate efficient non-fullerene acceptors.

These limitations were outweighed by the unique strengths of our study, including its prospective design, completeness and careful ascertainment of device outcomes, and its population-based nature where all patients were recruited without the need to obtain informed consent and the attendant risks of selection bias.

Participants who had already been allocated to Anapen were invited for a six-week or one-year (± Device Switch) outcome assessment as appropriate.

In a reported prospective trial, the application of the first generation Wallis device improved outcome in patients who underwent a second discectomy.

A report by Kushi and coworkers [ 1] presents important evidence for a positive impact of the device on outcome in septic patients.

Not knowing the real purpose of this protective device, the outcome and interpretation of this experiment all performed with state-of-the-art technology, well-developed and executed strategies, and proper statistics–is absolutely clear: the airbag must be the cause.

They did receive the smart-phones at the beginning of their control period, as these phones were not only used as a motivational tool (i.e., by provision of weekly autonomy-supportive text messages during the intervention period) but also as a measurement device (see "outcome measures").

The innovative trial design includes patients enrolled under a single inclusion and exclusion criteria, regardless of the intended use of the device, with outcomes ascertained in the short term (ST, at 6 months) and long term (LT, at 2 years).

Whether newer devices improve outcome needs to be tested in well-controlled prospective trials.

Monitoring with pulse oximetry continues to be a critical component of standard of care of critically ill patients despite the paucity of data that such devices improve outcome.

This includes a description of the event, the diagnosis, the date of event onset, the relationship of the event to any procedure or to the device system, the outcome of the event, and the date on which the event was first noticed by the investigator.