Sentence examples for device comparison from inspiring English sources

– Ashwin Seshagiri The new iPads were announced on the same day that Nokia unveiled its own, the Lumia 2520, and Microsoft's Surface 2 went on sale, which led to device comparison among spectators.

The system architecture is made up of four subsystems (see Figure 2) described as follows: uptake signal, device classification and acceptance, device comparison, and O/D matrix construction.

Second, the subsystem of device comparison implemented an algorithm that compares all the times that the device was captured by the sensor and stores only the record with the best power.

These observations, should they be confirmed using other shock wave lithotripters, may provide an important field parameter (i.e., P+ avg)) to guide appropriate application of SWL in clinics, and facilitate device comparison and design improvements in future lithotripters.

Table 1 Trusted personal device comparison Device Characteristic   R1 R2 R3 Smartphones, PDAs Y N N DORIS/DIVA Y N N Encryptakey Y Y N Smart cards Y Y N Network smart cards Y Y N Mobile and portable TCP Y Y Y.

Programmes of device comparison are currently underway (using a Saab SeaEye Falcon ROV) to make sure samples taken using the flying array and ROVs are standardised and comparable, giving the complete monitoring package pre- and post-device deployment.

Head-to-head device comparisons supported a statistically significant benefit of CRT-D when compared with CRT-P (0.81 (0.67–0.99)) and ICD (0.82 (0.82–0.82)).

Furthermore, this model may serve as a valuable tool to assist in different stages of product development such as concept validation, product optimization, in silico bench testing, regulatory affairs assistance, marketing support, and/or head-to-head device comparisons.

Beginning with a brief introduction of the PSC, studies regarding its suitability for tandem devices, comparison of single and multiple junction solar cells, and the progress made so far employing different perovskite absorbers, have been reviewed.

A large increase of the EOT signal was observed when the mouth-air sample was introduced to the sensing device, in comparison with the EOT change observed following the introduction of clean air. Figure 6b shows the comparison of VSC measures for three volunteers measured with our system clearly representing the ability of our device to distinguish oral hygiene conditions based on oral VSCs.

This study describes the CQP design and assesses the device in comparison to conventional electrode application.