Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The relative standard deviations vary from 1 to 18% and the averaged recoveries in the spike experiments are very high (65 120%) in the different types of samples studied.
Similar(59)
1.386 to 2.348 ng mL−1 and good relative standard deviations varied from 1.1% to 2.8% (n = 10) candidate this method for successful monitoring of analyte from various media.
Based on CML estimates from the fitted log-normal distribution, the (geometric) mean of pollen deposition onto leaves over all sites and days ranged depending on plant species between 54 and 478 n/cm2; standard deviations varied from 0.58 to 1.03 on a logarithmic scale, which is equivalent to a factor of 3.8 to 10.7 on a linear scale (Table 1).
For the entire study period of 26 weeks, the pharmacy and ward defined daily doses figures for all broad-spectrum antibiotics differed only by 0.2%; however, for single wards deviations varied from -4.3% to 6.9%.
We found that mean methylation of individual IAPs fluctuated from a low of 59% to a high of 88% and standard deviations varied from 1.9 to 7.3, indicating that individual transposons can differ dramatically in both average value and standard deviation among mice.
The deviation varies from 2 to 20%%.
The precision expressed as relative standard deviation varied from 1.2 to 3.6% for antimony, 1.8 3.9% for arsenic and 1.8 2% for selenium.
The results indicate that the relative deviation induced by slant-to-vertical conversion may be significant in certain instances, and the deviation varies from 0%to40%0% when the elevation decreases from 90° to 15°, while the relative IDAAS deviation is much smaller and varies from −5% to 15% without an elevation dependence.
The deviation varied from 1 bp to 60 bp.
The logarithm of the log-normal distribution had mean zero and its standard deviation varied from 0.1 to 2 in increments of 0.1.
The standard deviation varied from 0.00559 to 1.081, which was a dramatic decrease compared to that of the raw data with background subtraction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com