Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
1.386 to 2.348 ng mL−1 and good relative standard deviations varied from 1.1% to 2.8% (n = 10) candidate this method for successful monitoring of analyte from various media.
Based on CML estimates from the fitted log-normal distribution, the (geometric) mean of pollen deposition onto leaves over all sites and days ranged depending on plant species between 54 and 478 n/cm2; standard deviations varied from 0.58 to 1.03 on a logarithmic scale, which is equivalent to a factor of 3.8 to 10.7 on a linear scale (Table 1).
For the entire study period of 26 weeks, the pharmacy and ward defined daily doses figures for all broad-spectrum antibiotics differed only by 0.2%; however, for single wards deviations varied from -4.3% to 6.9%.
We found that mean methylation of individual IAPs fluctuated from a low of 59% to a high of 88% and standard deviations varied from 1.9 to 7.3, indicating that individual transposons can differ dramatically in both average value and standard deviation among mice.
Similar(56)
The relative standard deviations vary from 1 to 18% and the averaged recoveries in the spike experiments are very high (65 120%) in the different types of samples studied.
The precision expressed as relative standard deviation varied from 1.2 to 3.6% for antimony, 1.8 3.9% for arsenic and 1.8 2% for selenium.
The deviation varied from 1 bp to 60 bp.
The logarithm of the log-normal distribution had mean zero and its standard deviation varied from 0.1 to 2 in increments of 0.1.
The standard deviation varied from 0.00559 to 1.081, which was a dramatic decrease compared to that of the raw data with background subtraction.
The results indicate that the relative deviation induced by slant-to-vertical conversion may be significant in certain instances, and the deviation varies from 0%to40%0% when the elevation decreases from 90° to 15°, while the relative IDAAS deviation is much smaller and varies from −5% to 15% without an elevation dependence.
The deviation varies from 2 to 20%%.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com