Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
In Fig. 3, the average results of this study, with standard deviations values, are compared with other studies' results.
The results were analyzed statistically by determining standard deviations values and performing analysis of variance (ANOVA) test.
The average and standard deviations values of chosen 3D roughness parameters – Sa, Sq, Sk, Spk, Svk, Spq, Svq, Smq, Sds, Ssc, and Sdq – were determined.
The developed method showed a high repeatability and reproducibility (intraday and interday relative standard deviations values of 4.5% and 9.5%, respectively) and an adequate limit of detection (0.22 mg L−1).
The comparison between the experimental and the simulated data is shown in Figure 3a,b,c,d the deviation between them is within the experimental deviations values and they can be fitted with a straight line.
The R 2 and standard deviations values in S5 are similar for the V- and H-polarised situation in the LoS case, as the Tx antenna inclination of 45° yields practically equal powers in both polarisations.
Similar(49)
Standard deviation values are included.
Relative standard deviation values for repeatability were less than 3%.
Relative standard deviation values obtained were between 0.9 and 5.4%.
F0 values are obtained with the biased deviation values.
Values are given as mean ± standard deviation values.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com