Sentence examples for deviations in the area from inspiring English sources

The comparison between previous experimental results and those obtained with this approach shows remarkable agreement (the relative deviations in the area per surfactant molecule are of the order of 1%).

The haemodynamic response function time-to-peak was analysed in the Wernicke's aphasia group using finite impulse response functions and showed no significant deviations in the areas of peak activation.

The system was simulated and the frequency deviations in area 1 and area 2 and tie-line power deviations for 5% step- load disturbance in area 1 are obtained.

It is demonstrated that the deviation in the constant area duct length, calculated by using an isentropic efficiency from the real length is three times greater than the one calculated by using a polytropic efficiency.

When analysing the correlation between hemifield RNFL thickness and total deviation in the corresponding area, superior RNFL thickness and total deviation in the inferior visual field demonstrated a significant correlation (r = 0.38 for VCC and r = 0.50 for ECC in the moderately myopic group; r = 0.54 for VCC and r = 0.60 for ECC in the highly myopic group).

Results were averaged over 100 simulations (standard deviations in parentheses): area under the ROC curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), Spearman correlation between true and estimated total causal effects, and mean squared error (MSE) of estimated total causal effects.

Results were averaged over 100 simulations (standard deviations in parentheses): area under the ROC curve (AUROC), area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC), Spearman correlation between true and estimated direct causal effects, and mean squared error (MSE) of estimated direct causal effects.

In general, there is a good agreement between EMAG2 and our survey, but systematic deviations occur, e.g. in the area marked by an ellipse at around 84°N, 81°W (Fig. 2 a, b)). Figure 2(c) shows the detrended grid difference (cyan) along a LOMGRAV traverse line (location indicated as black line in Fig. 2(b)) and the survey data ΔFsurvey after levelling (red).

For the cases in which the push test results differed from the theoretical expected strength (for example the 2 mm cube (4) bumps 300 μm and the 1 mm cube (2) bumps 760 μm), the cause could be deviations in the final bump covered area or even defects on component edges that lead to component rupture though the FS glass.

One complication in fully understanding the current results is the relative heterogeneity in the BD participants, as evidenced by the large between-subjects standard deviations in sway area.

This is an indication that the COM positioning mechanism may generate too symmetrically sized daughters, and will hence not allow for as large deviations in cell area as seen in experiments.