More recently, Yanase et al. [ 11] reported similar values for manual and automated methods; yet automated calculations had lower standard deviations and variation coefficients indicating better reproducibility.
Means, standard deviations and variation coefficients for the RTs were computed for individual subjects, as well as the means for different types of errors: False alarms (responses to non-target stimuli), omissions, anticipations (responses lower than 200 ms), total errors, d′ and C parameters.
However, it has been shown that the precision of the technique is excellent, [ 19]. and that deviations and variations in MR sequence parameters affect the results of cartilage quantification less than 10%% [ 20].
Table 2 demonstrates that standard deviation and variation in flow data are larger than observed speed data.
Indeed the statistical analysis of different parameters show the very acceptable limit of water parameters such as the ranges of pH values is 6.30 8.31 with mean, standard deviation and variation of coefficient value of 7.48, 0.422 and 0.056, respectively.
The average, standard deviation, and variation coefficient were calculated for each variable.
The average, standard deviation, and variation coefficient for the minimum diastolic velocity, systolic peak velocity, vessel diameter, pulsatility index and resistance index of both the right and left common carotid arteries and their respective genders are shown in Table 2.
In addition to the overall mean values, standard deviation and variation coefficients were computed for the total number of annotated sequences, sorted by either botanic family or plant organism, over the three statistical parameters.
This study used a method that is similar to the inverse location method and incorporates ray-tracing results to calculate azimuth deviation and celerity variation depending on source-to-receiver paths (ray-tracing is discussed further below).
Trait means, standard deviations and coefficients of variation (CV = standard deviation/mean) were used to compare phenotypic variation among flies across all 9 RI lines between traits.
Means, standard deviations, and coefficients of variation for each data set are shown in Table 2.
