Sentence examples for deviation ranges from from inspiring English sources

In the actual sample, the standard deviation ranges from 97.6% to 101.8%, indicating the high precision of present approach.

Similarly, for the forced convection mode, coefficient of correlation ranges from 0.96 to 1 and root mean square of percentage deviation ranges from 3.74 to 7.55%.

For active mode, coefficient of correlation ranges from 0.94 to 0.99 and root mean square of percentage deviation ranges from 3.49 to 12.24%.

LOD ranges from 0.05 to 0.07 μg L−1 and relative standard deviation ranges from 0.5% to 11.6% at concentrations 5 and 0.1 μg L−1, respectively.

The predicted temperatures of bitter gourd flakes, room air temperature and moisture evaporation rate show the fair agreement with the experimental observations within the root mean square of percentage deviation ranges from 6.10 to 10.41% and coefficient of correlation ranges from 0.96 to 0.99 under natural convection mode.

The predicted moisture evaporation rate, gooseberry surface and greenhouse room air temperatures show the fair agreement with the experimental observations within the root mean square of percentage deviation ranges from 4.58 to 16.39% and coefficient of correlation ranges from 0.96 to 1 under passive and active mode.

The relative standard deviation ranged from 6.9%too 12.2% for inter-day variations.

PAH recoveries for reference materials were between 88 and 98%, with a relative standard deviation ranging from 5 to 17%.

Relative standard deviation ranged from 5.3 to 8.4% and limit of detection was relatively low (0.01 0.06 μg L−1).

All the predicted results were generally in good agreement with lab measurements with average deviation ranging from 0.5 to 3% for the properties investigated.

The proposed methods showed good sensitivity, limits of quantification were lower than MRLs and precision (expressed as relative standard deviation) ranged from 2.9 to 11.1%.