Similar(8)
SD-standard deviation; Z-BMI-standard deviation score of BMI; Z-WC-standard deviation score of waist circumference; HOMA-IR-Homeostasis Model Assessment for Insulin Resistance; HOMA-B-Homeostatis Model Assessment for pancreatic β-cell function *P < 0.05 compared to Dutch native children, † P < 0.05 compared to Moroccan children, ‡ P < 0.01 compared to Moroccan children.
It was found that overweight children with T1DM had lower median standard deviation score of waist circumference (Z-WC) as compared to the overweight control group [median, 2.0 (interquartile range, IQR, 1.5 2.3) vs. 2.6 (IQR, 2.0 2.9), P < 0.001].
For a difference of 20 cm (approximately two standard deviations) in waist circumference, the multivariate RRs were 1.32 (95% CI: 0.73 2.37) among women and 1.74 (95% CI: 1.00 3.01) among men.
For a difference of 20 cm (about two standard deviations) in waist circumference, the multivariate RRs were 1.32 (95% CI: 0.73 2.37) among women and 1.74 (95% CI: 1.00 3.01) among men.
The reference values of waist circumference, including 3rd, 10th 25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, and 97th percentiles, and standard deviations were given for preschool children.
The mean value of waist circumference was higher in adult men than in women.> -wrap-foot> *Meandand standard deviation; **median and interquartile range.
We compared the independent power of waist circumference (WC), waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), and body mass index (BMI) in predicting CKD in a large cohort of adults.
Location of waist.
Related(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com