Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(5)
The mean age (± standard deviation) of participants was 49.0 ± 10.9 years.
The mean age and standard deviation of participants are 25.7 years (range 22 31) and 2.8 years, respectively.
An analysis of the variability (standard deviation) of participants' verbal response times provides a measure of how consistently they produced correct answers on each task.
The standard deviation of participants' eye positions for each task is shown in Fig. 4. A preliminary ANOVA on standard deviations in the equivalent noise task revealed no main effect of noise condition (' no noise', ' high noise') and no interactions with age group or speed condition, and so this factor was not analysed further.
The results for both experiments were analysed primarily in terms of the numbers of correct responses (accuracy scores), and the mean and variability (standard deviation) of participants' verbal response times, before (session one) and after (session two) the application of sham, cathodal and anodal cerebellar stimulation.
Similar(55)
Figure 5 shows the average deviation of participant drawn arrows from their equivalent optimal angles over the number of times a participant has performed the technique.
Table 2 presents the mean score and standard deviation of participant responses to each of the 28 capabilities.
The empirical mean (standard deviation) of participant level costs were estimated by age group, gender, depression status and condition.
The average number of errors made on the hierarchy recall test (see Methods for details of calculation of deviation of participant's reconstructed hierarchy from actual hierarchy) for the NO-FRAME and OLD-FRAME groups were 7.6 (SD 8.1) and 2.7 (SD 5.6), respectively (see Fig. 3A).
The mean ages (standard deviations) of participants were 54.1 (12.2) for men and 55.1 (13.0) for women.
The number and mean (standard deviation) age of participants by demographic characteristics, BMI, and history of medical conditions is shown in Table 1.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com