16 Again, any deviation from the testing protocol had to be noted by the staff member.
The formula predicted test results and model simulated values with reasonable accuracy, regardless of type of auxiliary bonded bars and different values of L p /L. (3) Predictions made by the equation provided by ACI 440.4R-04 significantificant deviations from the test results and model predictions, particularly for the beams reinforced with unbonded CFRP tendons and auxiliary bonded CFRP bars.
The child was allowed to exercise for one trial of approximately five seconds, where any sagittal plane deviations from the test instructions were corrected by the physiotherapist (e.g. forward bent trunk, too little knee flexion, not extending the knee completely or foot movements).
Practice effects in cognitive ability tests are now well described, with a meta-analysis [ 1] estimating that the magnitude of the improvement in test scores from the first test to the first re-sit would be approximately a quarter of the standard deviation from the first test, and a further fifth of a standard deviation to the second re-sit.
For the UMAT we now report quantitatively comparable results, with an estimated increment at the first re-sit of approximately two fifths of a standard deviation from the first test and a further one fifth of a standard deviation at the second re-sit.
The results showed evidence for continued plasticity until age 80 and above; substantial improvements in performance, comprising one standard deviation from the pre-test to the sixth trial, were observed.
This deviation from the normal testing procedure [ 24], where the dorsal aspect of the radius anchors one arm of the goniometer, was necessary as the wrist support interfered with this positioning when the forearm was supine.
The SEM was calculated using the formula: SEM = SD √1 - ICC, where SD = the standard deviation between scores from the test and retest [ 30].
The ELISA cut-off for the test to be considered seropositive was established as an optical density (OD) of 0.295, based on the average plus 3× the standard deviation of the test results from 14 clinically healthy people from the Amazon region, which would be considered an endemic population.
