Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(43)
This deviation could be explained by localized electromechanical coupling.
This deviation could be mainly ascribed to the difference of activation energy between YY and NN.
The deviation could be reduced by properly controlling the electron beam current or by changing the ingot composition.
But of course, it still has some deviation from the complete method of heat balance which using regression and assigning a coefficient to the model even this much of the deviation could be overcame.
This deviation could be attributed to the lack of occurrence of sub-Tg motions on the time scale of simulations due to the use of higher strain rates in simulations compared to experiments.
52 configurations were simulated and the estimations within EC validity range margins were in agreement with CFD (<15%), while in extremes (non-negligible entrance and exit patterns), a 70% deviation could be exceeded.
Similar(17)
The main loose-end in this answer was whether the actual motions do deviate from the Keplerian ideal, and if so, whether all the deviations could be attributed to specific forces, gravitational or otherwise.
If one already possessed an incontestable version of the truth, all these deviations could be seen as deplorable -- comparable, perhaps, to "wild analysis" in the Freudian tradition.
These latter deviations could be remarkably reduced by introducing the extra interaction energy term, i.e., ΔEex, for the specific counterion binding that was used to correct the observed deviations for the counterion activities.
The more arrows the user draws to different landmarks the more the impact of their deviations could be minimised.
Rather, the impact of the asymptotic standard deviations could be examined to understand the accuracy of the model fitness (Hogg et al. 2005).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com