Sentence examples for deviation corresponding from inspiring English sources

Consequently, the standard deviation corresponding to GSO is 0.0121, lager than that of GSOICLW.

Next, 100 TACs per k3 were generated by adding Poisson-like noise to the noiseless TACs, with zero mean and a standard deviation corresponding to 5 and 10% of the average uptake value of the last two frames.

For each coefficient, the standard deviation corresponding to the mean value over the several runs of the algorithm represents a reliable measure of the robustness of the approach with respect to uncertainties in the computation of the PV TAC.

A statistical power analysis was performed to determine the optimal number of subjects needed to find a difference in the mean of 15% (expected for VO2max) with a standard deviation corresponding to 20% of the means with a power of 80%.

We decided to mix bioactivity data from different assays given that Kalliokoski et al. [37] reported that the standard deviation of public IC50 data is 25% larger than the standard deviation corresponding to public Ki data, and thus mixing IC50 data from different assays adds a moderate level of noise.

A normal distribution with mean and standard deviation corresponding to these speeds was then used for weighting.

σ i and σ j are the standard deviations corresponding to the holding period returns of annual costs of the ith and jth aggregators, respectively, and ρ ij is the correlation among them.

Ellipsoids were calculated by the cluster mean and 3 standard deviations corresponding to two-dimensional projections of the first and second principal components over consecutive 30 min data recordings.

In this analysis, the parameter SD = 0.03 was chosen such that all DMR standard deviations (corresponding to the semi-difference of methylation values in the case of two replicas) are located in the top 5-percentile.

Table  2 presents the dimensions found for the anatomical structures examined: mean, maximal and minimal dimensions with standard deviations, corresponding time points, and the number of time points at which dimensions were significantly different from the maximum or minimum (p < 0.05).

The sample size was calculated to give the study 90% power to detect a difference of 0.7 standard deviations, corresponding to a 75% probability that a person in the intervention group would do better than a person in the control group.