Sentence examples similar to deviant levels of from inspiring English sources

One might also anticipate a graded recovery pattern across adjacent deviant levels, with discriminable responses between each possible combination of levels (e.g., same concept vs. high-related concept).

We further reasoned that the pattern of recovery might be graded across adjacent deviant levels, affording flexible selection, retrieval, and categorization of concepts at a variety of levels of abstraction.

To visualize patterns in the 5D space defined by the beta weights for Deviant Levels 1 5, we adopted a mixture of empirical and theory-driven approaches.

We also performed a series of post hoc comparisons on the deviant levels (paired t-tests) for each curve to characterize its precise shape.

At the perceptual extreme, the image-selective model was defined by continued adaptation (value of 0) to the identical picture (Deviant Level 1) and full recovery (value of 1) to any picture with different 2D stimulus form (Deviant Levels 2 5).

Similarly, the effect of recovery from adaptation was evaluated as a weighted contrast between the regressor for Deviant Level 1 and those for Deviant Levels 2 5 (Deviant Level 1 < Deviant Levels 2 5), thresholded at P < 0.025 (1 tailed) and corrected for multiple comparisons (P < 0.05) using cluster size.

We first confirmed in a behavioral rating study (N = 7 subjects) that our manipulation of conceptual relatedness between anchor and deviant pictures was valid (Fig. 2 B ). Subjects did indeed judge anchor deviant pairs with a larger conceptual distance (Deviant Levels 1 5) to be less similar (F4,24 = 252.69; P < 0.0005).

We performed a conjunction analysis to find voxels that showed both adaptation (first > last in the anchor sequence, P < 0.025, 1 tailed, corrected for cluster size at P < 0.05) and recovery from adaptation (Deviant Level 1 < average of Levels 2 5, P < 0.025, 1 tailed, corrected for cluster size at P < 0.05) (Fig. 3; see Nichols et al., 2005).

Strong recovery from adaptation was expected even for the same concept condition (Deviant Level 2), as this condition consisted of different exemplar pictures (e.g., a different cow picture) that always varied from anchors in left/right orientation and often in part/whole view (e.g., face of a cow vs. face + body).

Post hoc paired comparisons (paired t-tests) were then conducted for each type of tuning curve to determine the statistical significance of differences between individual deviant level responses.

The Tuning Type × Deviant Level interactions were assessed between each pair of tuning types with separate ANOVAs (image selective vs. perceptual/conceptual-broad, image selective vs. conceptual-narrow, and perceptual/conceptual-broad vs. conceptual-narrow).